Regulation of Intimacy
Laws that regulate abortion have played a critical role in sexual and reproductive health. Laws have also played a critical role in the regulation of intimate behavior and relationships, and the regulation of sexual and gender diverse populations. The Center’s work has examined the ways in which these laws have improved, as well as harmed, the health of these communities.
- Eschliman EL, Adames CN, Rosen JD. Anti-discrimination laws as essential tools for achieving LGBTQ+ health equity. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2023; 329(10): 793-794.
- Rosen JD, Beyrer C. Implications of Dobbs for the (re)criminalization of intimacy among LGBTQ persons. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2022; 328(20): 2011-2012.
- Rosen, JD, Ramirez JJ (2022). When doctors are “doxxed:” An analysis of information posted on an antiabortion website. Contraception, 115:1-4.
- Rosen, J.D. (2020), June Medical Services v. Russo – A Threat to Physicians’ Standing to Challenge Abortion Regulations. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(12): 1101-1103.
- Messing AJ, Fabi R, Rosen JD (2020), Reproductive Injustice at the US Border. American Journal of Public Health, 110(3): 339-344.
- Rosen, J. D. (2017), Finding Strength in Numbers: The Critical Role of Data in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 129(1): 195-196.
- Rosen, J. D. (2012), The Public Health Risks of Crisis Pregnancy Centers. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44: 201-205