Skip to main content
Issue Brief

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING FOR ALL

Exploring strategies to help older adults, including persons with cognitive impairments or dementia, plan end-of-life care.  

ADVANCED CARE PLANNING (ACP) CHALLENGES & STRATEGIES

Advanced Care Planning (ACP) is a communication process that helps individuals to understand and share their personal values, life goals, and preferences for future medical care, helping to avoid costly, burdensome end-of-life care. Primary care is an important setting for advance care planning, especially for older adults, due to longstanding and trusted relationships with clinicians, the frequent periodicity of visits, and because older adults prefer their primary care clinician to initiate such conversations. 

 

AN UNMET NEED: ACP FOR PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA 

Unfortunately, research has focused on increasing advance care planning in general primary care populations, while excluding persons with dementia who are less likely and able to participate in advance care conversations, appoint decision-makers or complete a living will. Strategies for this population must take into account special considerations, including (1) Capacity for Medical Decision-Making; (2) Family Involvement; and (3) Engagement and Communication. 

BRIDGING THE GAP: RESOURCES & RESEARCH 

Testing evidence-based interventions in the real world is challenging, yet necessary to ensure the interventions yield meaningful benefits for patients and align with the priorities, workflows and data systems of care organizations and settings. With support from the National Institute on Aging and in close partnership with Johns Hopkins Community Physicians and MedStar Health System, the Roger and Flo Lipitz Center to Advance Policy in Aging and Disability developed a series of ACP communications resources and strategies for use in primary care settings, to better reach and serve older adults, including those who are living with cognitive impairment or dementia. We then undertook two studies, SHARE and SHARING CHOICES, to measure their efficacy. 

 

INTERVENTION COMPONENTS

Personal Communication 

Letters were sent to patients introducing advance care planning as part of routine visits. 

Planning Checklist 

A guide for patient-family conversations aimed to spur discussion and foster alignment on advance care plans and family members’ roles.

Patient Portal Support 

Clinicians helped connect family members, as desired by the patient, to the patient portal, legitimizing their role and enabling communication with the provider.

Trained Facilitators 

Patients and families were connected to professionals trained in Respecting Choices, an evidence-based program that supports advance care planning conversations. 

Provider Education 

Training and other resources were provided to clinical staff to help them identify cognitive impairment and make appropriate referrals for support services and follow-up.

RESEARCH

 

The SHARE Study

The SHARE Study sought to understand the quality of patient and care partner communications about advanced care planning with their primary care providers to understand the effect of the intervention resources. The study surveyed patients and their care partners at 6, 12 and 24 months and sent bereavement surveys to care partners following patients’ deaths. A collection of audio-recorded advance care planning conversations added depth to the interpretation of SHARE findings.

KEY FINDINGS: 

  • 2 in 3 patients and caregiver partners had at least one conversation about advance care planning.
  • Intervention care partners and patients reported greater readiness to engage in ACP at 6 and 12 months, respectively, and were more likely to report having completed selected key aspects of ACP. 
  • Intervention patients reported better quality of communication about end-of-life care at 12 months. 
  • Patients were more likely to report having named a surrogate decision-maker. 
  • Older adults with cognitive impairment were able to participate in ACP conversations but engagement of care partners necessarily increased as they often assumed a translator-like role, providing context, reorienting patients to prior conversations and integrating supportive communication techniques such as repetition and mirroring to elicit patient participation and engagement. 

    See the full results

SHARE At-A-Glance:

273

NUMBER OF PATIENTS AND CARE PARTNERS SURVEYED

80+

AGE OF ADULTS WITH MILD TO SEVERE COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

8

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT CLINICS

2 in 3

FRACTION OF RESPONDENTS WHO HAD AT LEAST ONE CONVERSATION ABOUT ADVANCED CARE PLANNING

References for The SHARE Study

Abshire Saylor, M., Hanna, V., Zhang, P., Thai, G. H., Green, C. M., Cagle, J. G., & Wolff, J. L. (2024). Advance care planning in adults ages
80 years and older with impaired cognition: Using actual conversations to examine best practices. Alzheimer’s & Dementia.
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14331


Cagle JG, Reiff JS, Smith A, et al. Assessing Advance Care Planning Fidelity within the Context of Cognitive Impairment: The SHARE Trial.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024;68(2):180-189. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.05.002


Reiff, J. S., Cagle, J., Zhang, T., Roth, D. L., & Wolff, J. L. (2023). Fielding the quality of communication questionnaire to persons with
cognitive impairment and their family in primary care: A pilot study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 71(1), 221–226.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18034


Wolff JL, Cagle J, Echavarria D, et al. Sharing Health Care Wishes in Primary Care (SHARE) among older adults with possible cognitive
impairment in primary care: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023;129:107208.
doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107208


Wolff, J. L., Cagle, J. G., Hanna, V., Dy, S. M., Echavarria, D., Giovannetti, E. R., Boyd, C. M., Saylor, M. A., Hussain, N., Reiff, J. S.,
Scerpella, D., Zhang, T., Sekhon, V. K., & Roth, D. L. (2024). Sharing health care wishes among older adults with cognitive impairment in
primary care: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Alzheimer’s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14210

The SHARING CHOICES Study

The SHARING CHOICES Study sought to understand if ACP resources and interventions could be successfully implemented in routine practice. In partnership with health system leaders, the trial allowed flexibility to accommodate system-specific staffing, workflows and priorities. These adaptations were essential in overcoming resource constraints faced by primary care practices and responding to the clinical context of each location. After embedding the intervention, the research team used electronic health records and regional health information exchange data to study whether patients had documented end-of-life preferences or received costly and burdensome care before death. The study also examined patient experiences, challenges, the effectiveness of facilitators, and the potential to sustain the program.

KEY FINDINGS:

  • Documentation of end-of-life preferences increased two-fold but was attenuated in vulnerable subpopulations, including older patients, Black patients and persons with dementia.
  • Additional attention and systems are needed to meet the needs of persons with dementia and care partners.
  • Transitioning to remote modalities—a necessity during the COVID-19 outbreak in the midst of the study—inhibited accessibility for persons with dementia 

SEE THE FULL RESULTS

SHARING Choices At-A-Glance:

64,915

NUMBER OF PATIENTS

65+

AGE OF ADULTS OF ALL ABILITIES

19

NUMBER OF DIFFERENT CLINICS RANDOMLY SELECTED TO IMPLEMENT INTERVENTIONS

References for The SHARING CHOICES Study

Abshire Saylor, M., Scerpella, D., Chapin, M., Jajodia, A., Kadali, A., Colburn, J., Cotter, V., & Wolff, J. (2024). Developing archetypes for
key roles in a pragmatic trial: implementing human-centered design to promote advance care planning in primary care. In
Implementation Science Communications. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4220004/v1


Colburn JL, Scerpella DL, Chapin M, et al. SHARING Choices: Lessons Learned from a Primary-Care Focused Advance Care Planning
Intervention. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023;66(2):e255-e264. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.014
 

Cotter, V. T., Sloan, D. H., Scerpella, D. L., Smith, K. M., Abshire Saylor, M., & Wolff, J. L. (2024). Feasibility of Using Simulation to Evaluate
Implementation Fidelity in an Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®.
doi:10.1177/10499091241282087


Dy SM, Scerpella DL, Hanna V, et al. Qualitative evaluation of the SHARING Choices trial of primary care advance care planning for
adults with and without dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024;72(11):3413-3426. doi:10.1111/jgs.19154
Dy SM, Scerpella DL, Cotter V, et al. SHARING Choices: Design and rationale for a pragmatic trial of an advance care planning
intervention for older adults with and without dementia in primary care. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022;119:106818.
doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.106818
 

Smith, K. M., Scerpella, D., Guo, A., Hussain, N., Colburn, J. L., Cotter, V. T., Aufill, J., Dy, S. M., & Wolff, J. L. (2022). Perceived Barriers
and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without
Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 13.
doi:10.1177/21501319221137251
 

Wolff, J. L., Scerpella, D., Cockey, K., Hussain, N., Funkhouser, T., Echavarria, D., Aufill, J., Guo, A., Sloan, D. H., Dy, S. M., & Smith, K. M.
(2021). SHARING Choices: A Pilot Study to Engage Family in Advance Care Planning of Older Adults With and Without Cognitive
Impairment in the Primary Care Context. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 38(11), 1314–1321.
doi:10.1177/1049909120978771

Wolff, J. L., Scerpella, D., Giovannetti, E. R., Roth, D. L., Hanna, V., Hussain, N., Colburn, J. L., Saylor, M. A., Boyd, C. M., Cotter, V.,
McGuire, M., Rawlinson, C., Sloan, D. H., Richards, T. M., Walker, K., Smith, K. M., Dy, S. M., Anderson, R., Cockey, K., … Zhang, T. (2024).
Advance Care Planning, End-of-Life Preferences, and Burdensome Care. JAMA Internal Medicine.
doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6215


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: National Institute on Aging R01AG058671; R33AG061882

POLICY, PRACTICE & SUSTAINABILITY

Planning for future medical decision-making is multifaceted and highly personal.  Findings from SHARE and SHARING Choices underscore the complexity of advance care planning in the primary care context, particularly for populations with heightened vulnerability, such as persons with cognitive impairment and dementia, but they raise very different implications for policy, practice, and sustainability.

Key recommendations from studies include:

Recommendations for health systems and clinicians
Recommendations patients and Care Partners
  • Integrate care partners into primary care visits and communications.
  • Secure care partner access to patient portals.
  • Utilize an advance care planning checklist.
  • Hold structured, formal conversations between patient, care partner and primary care physician to ensure shared understanding of patient and care partner needs and plans.
  • Create a shared framework for future care decisions based on patients’ values.

STUDY TEAM

Johns Hopkins University 

Jennifer L. Wolff (PI SHARE, MPI SHARING Choices)  

Sydney Dy (MPI SHARING Choices)  

Cythia M. Boyd 

Jessica Colburn  

Valerie Cotter  

Diane Echavarria 

Tara Funkhouser 

Valecia Hanna 

Naaz Hussain 

Maura McGuire 

Karyn Nicholson 

Christine Rawlinson  

Jenni Reiff   

Tom Richards  

David Roth  

Martha Abshire Saylor  

Vishaldeep Kaur Sekhon  

Danny Scerpella  

Danetta Sloan  

Talan Zhang 

MedStar Health System 

Ryan Anderson  

Kimberly Cockey  

Erin R. Giovanetti  

Sri Rebala  

Neha Sharma  

Kelly M. Smith  

Kathryn Walker  

 

University of Maryland School of Social Work 

John Cagle  

Peiyuan Zhang